Prince Charles and William said to be behind Prince Andrew title loss

[ad_1]


  • We earn a commission for products purchased through some links in this article.

  • Prince Charles and Prince William were ‘furious with Prince Andrew’ as it’s claimed they were involved in advising the Queen to strip Prince Andrew of his royal patronages and military titles following a sex abuse lawsuit.


    Prince Charles and Prince William are understood to have played a part in the Queen’s decision-making over stripping Prince Andrew of his royal patronages and military titles, as it’s claimed they were ‘furious’ with Prince Andrew.

    News broke that Prince Andrew had been stripped of his military titles and the use of HRH after it was reported that he faces a US civil action over sexual assault allegations – claims he has consistently denied.

    A source close to the duke said he would “continue to defend himself” against the case brought in New York by Virginia Giuffre.

    But the source insisted a judge’s ruling on Wednesday that the civil action could proceed was “not a judgement on the merits of Ms Giuffre’s allegations”.

    It comes after Prince Andrew’s bid to have the case rejected was scrapped.

    Buckingham Palace released a statement that reads, “With the Queen’s approval and agreement, the Duke of York’s military affiliations and Royal patronages have been returned to the Queen.

    “The Duke of York will continue not to undertake any public duties and is defending this case as a private citizen.”

    And while the Queen attributed to the actions of removing his title, it’s unlikely that she made the decision without consulting other senior members of the royal family.

    Nicholas Witchell, a royal correspondent for the BBC, believes that the Prince of Wales and his son, the Duke of Cambridge had a hand in advising the Queen to strip his privileges.

    Speaking on BBC News at Ten, he said, “I think we can detect the hands of Charles and William in all of this.

    “It would be very odd if the Queen was not consulting them – was not taking their council – particularly in the absence of the Duke of Edinburgh.

    “They will be concerned, I’m sure, for Andrew at a human level, but they are very much more concerned for the reputation of the institution.

    “Andrew’s position regarding the regiments was plainly untenable, he has agreed, we’re told, not to use the styling of HRH anymore and he will fight this case as a private citizen.”

    Royal commentator, Angela Levin told The Sun that Prince Charles and Prince William would have been ‘furious with prince Andrew’

    She explained, ‘If the Queen asked Prince Charles and Prince William they would have been very firm, Prince William and Prince Charles have been absolutely furious with him bringing the Royal Family into disrepute.

    ‘Whatever he may or may not have done he certainly was a friend of Epstein and invited him to parties, royal parties when they knew he had been accused of having relationships with underage girls.’

    ‘So there’s no doubt about that. I would imagine that this time the Queen would also listen to her aides. But she also has strong views so if she didn’t want to do it, she wouldn’t have done it – she obviously felt they’d crossed a red line.’

    Prince Charles is next in line to the throne, followed by Prince William when it comes to the royal line of succession.

    And the Palace comments come as Prince Andrew faces a court showdown after a New York judge ruled Virginia Guiffre’s lawsuit against him could go ahead.

    Ms Guiffre has alleged the duke sexually assaulted her when she was a teenager.

    However, he has vehemently denied the allegations made against him.

    Windsor Castle

    And according to the Mirror, Prince William reportedly met the monarch in her private quarters at Windsor Castle to decide the future of Prince Andrew’s titles.

    Sources told the publication, the conversation decided the “axe should swiftly fall” on Prince Andrew’s royal career.

    Mr Witchell continued, “For Andrew this must be devastating, the last bits of superstructure, of framework, around him for the last 40 years have been taken away.”



    [ad_2]

    Source link

    Leave a comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *